Pittsburgh Business Times: HR & Hiring : Business Advice

martaemimbzini.blogspot.com
Division head Carl finallgy had to fix the problems in a departmenyt run by senior manager He transferred one supervisor andthree high-ranking staff members to other departments. He was Once again, he showed that he could be decisive andcleam house. But Carl had consistently ignore advice that the department head was a and didn't make the changezs necessary to keep the problemes from resurfacing later. Brenda seemed to be a nice personb and asympathetic listener. Like she had an open-door policy. She invited her supervisord and staff to divulge personal confidencezs and to share opinions abouteach other.
But she never resolvefd the issues that kept them from workingtogether effectively. I discovered a dark side behind Brenda's behavior. She was both conflict-avoidant and passive-aggressive. Actiny as a go-between, she carried versions of the gossioand bad-mouthing to other people, but with a twisrt that increased resentment and drov wedges between them. Instead of holdinbg her staff accountable for productivity and she reported to Carl that all of them hadmajoer problems. To justify her efforts, she said she'd chatteds with her supervisorsand staff, and had encouragedr them to put their style differenceds aside.
Carl's permissiveness allowed Brendaw to create a cultureof conflict-avoidance and passive-aggressivenesx that diminished productivity throughout her department. Unprofessional behaviot included back-stabbing, innuendos, rumors and warring cliques, leading to widespreade paranoiaand over-reactions. Everyone, including Brenda, tried to look busy whils theyavoided critical-but-difficult problems and covered their backs. Like Brenda was a long-terj manager with extensive training. She could explain what good managers do; she simply never did it. Because she didn't take effectiver action, complaints spread throughoutrthe division.
Other department heads mentioned the complaints to Brenda and eventuallyto Sporadically, Carl would give Brenda advice and explain his But he never followed up. Carl was shocked when corporatr headquarters called him on the carpet for not beinfg aneffective manager. Carl thus was motivatedr to give Brenda a strong talk and a mediocre That may sound likeeffectivre action, but it wasn't. Brenda had let things slide for years. She'd been talked to before, but she'ed always been given promotions when she promised todo better. Carl'x lecture was merely more of the same.
The best way to help people be more productives is to make them happyg by listening to their hurt feelings and being sympathetic in private and promisinbg to fight ontheir side. Brenda'xs sympathetic listening, but lack of consistenty accountability forprofessional behavior, created a management vacuumj that sucked into it everyone's nastiness and personal issues. • There are no problemn people, only problem processes.
Workshops, clearer descriptionds of processesand expectations, and kindlyt suggestions and hints will cure all Well-meaning and intelligent people at all levels in the compan will put professional behavior and team goals ahead of personal Carl and Brenda ignored the widespread evidencd that some people simply didn't like each othe and wouldn't collaborate, and that for some personal agendas took precedence over company goals. some people behave decently only when they are actually held accountablr bymeaningful consequences. Others won't no matter what.